Reports suggesting Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain could be set for a one-year deal at Celtic will inevitably split opinion.
If it happens, I’d welcome it for what it is—an experienced squad player who can add depth if he stays fit.
But let’s be absolutely clear.
The Celtic board must not think this is a replacement for Arne Engels.
If Engels leaves this summer for the reported £30 million or thereabouts, as now looks increasingly possible, Celtic simply have to reinvest that money in another young, high-quality midfielder capable of taking the club forward.
Replacing one of Europe’s brightest young talents with a 32-year-old whose best years are behind him would be a huge step backwards.
So far this summer, the only additions to the first-team environment have been three familiar faces already at the club.
Martin O’Neill.
Shaun Maloney.
Mark Fotheringham.
Not a single new first-team player has been brought in.
Now the prospect of Oxlade-Chamberlain arriving on a short-term deal is gathering momentum.
As a squad option? Fine.
As the marquee midfield signing after potentially banking £30 million for Arne Engels?
Absolutely not.
The board won’t turn down that kind of money if it arrives. History tells us that.
But if they do sanction such a sale, supporters have every right to expect the club to show ambition and replace Engels with another elite young talent—not simply hope that experience can fill the gap.
This transfer window was supposed to be about strengthening from a position of power after another successful season.
Instead, supporters are still waiting for signs of genuine ambition.
A one-year deal for “The Ox” might make sense as part of the squad.
It must never become the headline act.
If Arne Engels leaves for around £30 million, who should Celtic target as his replacement—and would Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain be enough on his own?
He isn’t replacing Engels, he will replace Hatate in the squad
Don’t be silly of course that’s not the plan first one of your columns I disagree with