Every transfer window begins the same way.
Hope.
Optimism.
Excitement.
Supporters dream about the signings that could take Celtic to the next level. We analyse rumours, watch highlight reels and imagine how new faces might transform the team.
Then reality sets in.
Optimism turns into impatience.
Impatience becomes frustration.
Frustration becomes anger.
Anger gives way to disbelief.
Eventually, for many supporters, disbelief turns into apathy. We almost expect things to go wrong because we’ve seen the same pattern play out too many times.
This isn’t about one transfer window.
It’s about every transfer window.
The names change.
The story never does.
This summer alone we’ve watched the drawn-out situations involving Shaun Maloney and Mark Fotheringham’s coaching appointments, the uncertainty surrounding Saracchi, the lengthy pursuit of Kelechi Iheanacho, the prolonged negotiations for Camilo Durán, continued speculation around Alfie Devine, and other targets who seem to drift from headline to headline without resolution.
Even when deals are eventually completed, they often feel unnecessarily prolonged.
That is the recurring issue.
Supporters aren’t demanding reckless spending. Most understand that negotiations are complex and that clubs have budgets. But there is a growing feeling that Celtic make life harder than it needs to be.
Why does everything seem to take so long?
Why do negotiations become public sagas?
Why do other clubs appear capable of acting decisively while Celtic repeatedly seem locked in endless discussions?
Those are fair questions.
The most frustrating part is the silence.
The club rarely explains its strategy. It doesn’t communicate openly with supporters about why deals stall or why priorities change. In that information vacuum, fans inevitably draw their own conclusions.
Rightly or wrongly, many now point towards Dermot Desmond, Michael Nicholson and Chris McKay as the figures ultimately responsible for the club’s transfer approach.
That perception has not appeared overnight.
It has been built over years of repeated experiences.
Too often Celtic appear to negotiate from a position of caution rather than conviction. The club has developed a reputation among supporters for trying to shave every possible pound off a transfer fee. Careful financial management is important, but there comes a point where caution risks becoming hesitation.
Football moves quickly.
Opportunities don’t wait forever.
While Celtic negotiate over relatively small differences, rival clubs often step in decisively. Supporters are left wondering whether the savings achieved justify the cost of missing out on players who could improve the team immediately.
The concern isn’t simply about individual signings.
It’s about what that approach says to the rest of football.
Selling clubs know Celtic are interested.
Agents know negotiations may drag on.
Competing clubs know there may still be time to hijack a deal.
That isn’t a position of strength.
It’s a reputation that risks becoming self-fulfilling.
No one outside the boardroom knows exactly why negotiations take as long as they do. There may be legitimate financial, legal or contractual reasons in individual cases. But when the same criticism returns window after window, supporters are entitled to ask whether there is a deeper structural problem.
Martin O’Neill can only work with the squad placed at his disposal.
The coaching staff cannot negotiate contracts.
Players cannot sign themselves.
Responsibility for recruitment ultimately sits above the dressing room.
Celtic remain one of the healthiest clubs financially in Britain. Supporters fill Celtic Park, buy season tickets, purchase merchandise and follow the club across the world. They invest not only their money but also their time, emotion and unwavering loyalty.
In return, they expect competence.
Not extravagance.
Not reckless spending.
Simply competence.
Supporters understand that some deals will fail. That is football. What becomes difficult to accept is when delays, uncertainty and missed opportunities appear to become the norm rather than the exception.
The Lisbon Lions built Celtic’s reputation through courage and ambition. Modern Celtic should aspire to show those same qualities in the boardroom.
Until the club demonstrates that it can consistently identify targets, negotiate decisively and communicate more openly with the support, the same questions will continue to be asked every transfer window.
Because the most frustrating part isn’t that one deal takes too long.
It’s that, with Celtic, it feels like every deal does.



Before anyone calls me a happy clapper i am not i am a supporter who is also a shareholder having invested twice when Fergus gave everyone a chance.
It the age of digital media every day there are bloggers like the write of the article ripping into the Celtic board no matter what Celtic do. They do this without actually thinking there is two sides to every deal so why dont they tell the world what the other sides actually are happening?
Because they dont know, they would rather attack the club and then claim to be supporters
I would like change at the too as much as anyone but love it or hate it the truth is the bloggers spread negative news like a cancer and deserve to be banned from Celtic media conferences.
Think about this when you read the daily crap like this article and all others today
I used to have my own theory as to why we wont spend until late August, but I thought that can’t be right, the money saved would be miniscule.
The theory being Celtic wont sign players between June 1st and August 25th because they’d be paying wages to players who aren’t playing, so they’re laying out money and getting nothing in return. It’s only something I used to consider, but in the long term doesnt help the team.
[…] Celtic board should not confuse the loyalty of the support with unlimited […]
True 👍 HH